Should the employee fails to provide a grievance notice, the NIRC may perhaps dismiss the grievance petition. This is because the employer has not experienced a chance to answer the grievance and attempt to resolve it. In certain cases, the NIRC may perhaps allow the employee to amend the grievance petilion to incorporate the grievance notice. However, this is generally only finished In the event the employee can show that they'd a good reason for not serving the grievance notice. Within the present case, the parties were allowed to steer evidence plus the petitioner company responded into the allegations therefore they were nicely aware of the allegations and led the evidence as such this point is ofno use to become looked into in constitutional jurisdiction at this stage. Bench: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Abdur Rahman Source: Order: Downloads 204 Order Date: 04-FEB-25 Approved for Reporting WhatsApp

The police has the power to arrest a person even without obtaining a warrant of arrest from a court. The loads of this power casts an obligation about the police and it must bear in mind, as held by this Court that if a person is arrested for just a crime, his constitutional and fundamental rights must not be violated. Read more

Matter:-HARASSMENT Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Writer) Const. P. 235/2025 (S.B.) Atif S/o Latif V/S Province of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi SHC Citation: SHC-252216 Tag:The regulation enjoins the police to become scrupulously fair for the offender as well as Magistracy is to ensure a fair investigation and fair trial for an offender. Unfortunately, these objectives have remained unfulfilled. Aberrations of police officers and police excesses in dealing with the law and order situation have been the subject of adverse comments from this Court and from other courts but they have did not have any corrective effect on it. The police has the power to arrest a person even without obtaining a warrant of arrest from a court.

The loads of this power casts an obligation over the police and it must bear in mind, as held by this Court that if a person is arrested for your crime, his constitutional and fundamental rights must not be violated. However it can be made clear that police is free to choose action against any person who is indulged in criminal activities subject matter to law. eight. The DIGP concerned is directed to prioritize this matter and, after hearing both parties within two weeks, address the alleged police misconduct. In case the officials are found culpable, departmental proceedings for their punishment must be initiated, they usually shall be assigned non-subject duties while in the interim period. Bench: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Creator) Source: Order: Downloads 113 Order Date: 08-APR-25 Approved for Reporting WhatsApp

Therefore, this petition is found to become not maintainable and is also dismissed along with the pending application(s), as well as the petitioners may possibly look for remedies through the civil court process as discussed supra. Read more

These past decisions are called "case regulation", or precedent. Stare decisis—a Latin phrase meaning "Enable the decision stand"—may be the principle by which judges are bound to these kinds of past decisions, drawing on founded judicial authority to formulate their positions.

During the United States, courts exist on both the federal and state levels. The United States Supreme Court is the highest court inside the United States. Lower courts around the federal level include things like the U.S. Courts of Appeals, U.S. District Courts, the U.S. Court of Claims, as well as U.S. Court of International Trade and U.S. Bankruptcy Courts. Federal courts hear cases involving matters related to the United States Constitution, other federal laws and regulations, and certain matters that require parties from different states or countries and large sums of money in dispute. Just about every state has its very own judicial system that includes trial and appellate courts. The highest court in each state is commonly referred to since the “supreme” court, Even though there are a few exceptions to this rule, for example, the New York Court of Appeals or perhaps the Maryland Court of Appeals. State courts generally listen to cases involving state constitutional matters, state law and regulations, Despite the fact that state courts can also generally listen to cases involving federal laws.

Amir Abdul Majid, 2021 SCMR 420. 12. There isn't any denial from the fact that in Government service it is expected that the persons possessing their character previously mentioned board, free from any moral stigma, are to get inducted. Verification of character and antecedents is often a condition precedent for appointment to your Government service. The candidates must have good character and provide two recent character certificates from unrelated individuals. What is discernible from the above mentioned is that the only impediment to being appointed into a Government service may be the conviction on an offense involving moral turpitude but involvement, which does not culminate into a proof by conviction, cannot be a way out or guise to accomplish absent with the candidature on the petitioner. Read more

161 . Const. P. 642/2023 (D.B.) Fatima Noor V/S Dow University of Health Science and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi Coming for the main case, It's also a effectively-proven proposition of regulation that when an inquiry is conducted on charges of misconduct by a public servant, the Court is concerned with determining whether the inquiry was held by a competent officer or whether rules of natural justice are complied with. Whether the findings or conclusions are based on some evidence, the authority entrusted with the power to hold inquiry has jurisdiction, power, and authority to succeed in a finding of fact or summary. But that finding must be based on some evidence. Neither the technical rules nor proof of the fact or evidence while in the Stricto-Sensu, implement to disciplinary proceedings. When the authority accepts that evidence and conclusion obtain support therefrom, the disciplinary authority is entitled to hold that the delinquent officer is guilty from the charge, however, that is subject matter to your procedure provided under the relevant rules rather than otherwise, to the reason that the Court in its power of judicial review does not act as appellate authority to re-value the evidence and to reach at its independent findings around the evidence.

twelve. There is no denial from the fact that in Government service it is predicted that the persons possessing their character above board, free from any moral stigma, are to generally be inducted. Verification of character and antecedents is usually a condition precedent for appointment to some Government service. The candidates must have good character and supply two recent character certificates from unrelated individuals. What is discernible from the above is that the only impediment to being appointed to your Government service could be the conviction on an offense involving moral turpitude but involvement, which does not culminate into a proof by conviction, cannot be a way out or guise to complete absent with the candidature from the petitioner. Bench: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Writer) Source: Order: Downloads 185 Order Date: 15-JAN-25 Approved for Reporting WhatsApp

twelve . Const. P. 245/2025 (S.B.) Qurban Ali S/o Qasim V/S Province of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi The legislation enjoins the police to generally be scrupulously fair into the offender plus the Magistracy is to make sure a fair investigation and fair trial for an offender. Unfortunately, these objectives have remained unfulfilled. Aberrations of police officers and police excesses in dealing with the legislation and order situation have been the topic of adverse comments from this Court in addition to from other courts However they have did not have any corrective effect on it.

In 1997, the boy was placed check here into the home of John and Jane Roe as being a foster child. Even though the pair had two younger children of their very own at home, the social worker did not inform them about the boy’s history of both being abused, and abusing other children. When she made her report to your court the following day, the worker reported the boy’s placement inside the Roe’s home, but didn’t mention that the few experienced young children.

Usually, only an appeal accepted via the court of previous vacation resort will resolve these differences and, For most reasons, such appeals are often not granted.

Rulings by courts of “lateral jurisdiction” are certainly not binding, but may very well be used as persuasive authority, which is to present substance to the party’s argument, or to guide the present court.